Friday, February 28, 2020

Orbs Are Not Miss-taken Identities


In my quest to uncover the true meaning of orbs, I have been providing a clear and rational defense, using my own video, photograph and personal testimonial, as evidence, for why I believe orbs are not supernatural or paranormal and also why they are not simply inanimate particles or other creatures out of focus.
Next I want to explain why orbs are not miss-identification. I will show in my videos that orbs are not being mistaken for other objects or for camera anomalies. The orbs I film are not stars, satellites, aircraft, birds, lens flares, double exposure, illumination, back scatter, etc.
Although, other things can certainly be mistaken for orbs, as I will shown in the below videos, this does not mean that the true orbs I am filming do not exist. The difference between orbs and other objects is very clear indeed. #orb #orbs

https://youtu.be/HJm_U0TGwzQ (Orbs Are Camera Anomalies)
https://youtu.be/9eh2H_zROy8 (Some Believe Orbs Are Only Camera Anomalies)
https://youtu.be/TQoJbJScXtc (Orbservation Documentary)
https://youtu.be/2PJiMd1G9j8 (This Is An Orb. This Is Not An Orb)
https://youtu.be/PpUPQF6dreI (One Is An Orb)
https://youtu.be/VB57kUcf4kU (The Moon And Orbs)

Wednesday, February 26, 2020

Orbs Are Not Tiny Particles On Or Close To The Camera Lens In The "Orb Zone".

The Orb Zone

I have provided, numerous rational and reasonable reasons, based upon my extensive research and orbservation, as verified in my videos and photographs, as to why I believe orbs are not supernatural or paranormal. Yet, that is only half of the issue in truly understanding the nature of orbs.

There are two general or basic views on the nature of orbs. One I have already addressed, those that believe orbs are supernatural or paranormal creatures, beings or entities. The other half is those who believe orbs are only particles or camera anomalies, such as dust, pollen, water droplets, bokeh, etc., but not living creatures, beings or entities.

It is my opinion that this group is equally wrong in their interpretation of the nature of orbs, as the first group mentioned. I believe I will prove it, by listing their objections, as to why they believe orbs are only particles, followed by my responses, showing they are wrong, using my videos and photographs in support of my points.

Objection #1: Individuals in this group object to orbs being living creatures, because they believe orbs are only small particles on or very near the camera lens in an area identified as the "Orb Zone". When the particles are in this zone, they appear, out of focus, as spherical balls and these spherical out of focus particles, have been misinterpreted as living orbs.

My response to objection #1: If orbs are only out of focus particles on or close to the camera lens, in the area called the orb zone, how can they be caught on film, clearly moving behind structures far from the camera lens? 

There are, of course, particles, such as dirt, dust, spores, etc, and they can be on or close to the camera lens, and they can also appear out of focus, but those are not to be confused with the living orbs I have caught on film.  Living creatures called "orbs" are very different from particles, as clarified in my definition and as my videos and photographs clearly demonstrate.

I have seen the experiments, demonstrating how numerous dust particles, thrown close in front of a camera lens, look like orbs, as they become out of focus objects, known as bokeh. All this has proven, is that dust, out of focus, can appear as orbs, in this particular experiment. It does not prove there is no such thing as living orbs, as I have clearly filmed.

The problem with the orb zone theory, is not that it is incorrect about there being particles within a certain area, in front of the camera, that may be out of focus. The error is, the orb zone theory believes these out of focus particles therefore, explain away the living orbs I have captured on film and in photographs. We are talking apples and oranges. The existence of out of focus particles, does not mean therefore, living orbs cannot and do not exist.

I will show, in my films below, individual orbs moving behind objects, far from the camera lens, clearly demonstrating orbs are not dust particles and they are not in the orb zone, on or close to the camera lens.

If I am only filming a single dust particle and not a living orb, far from the camera lens, moving behind objects as these do, I would need equipment far more advanced, with much greater capabilities than mine, to capture such a minute single object. Equipment such as a micron telescope would be needed. All the experiments you will find, do not shown a single particle, but hundreds or thousands of particles together, which is significant.  

Dust and plant spores, do not travel through the sky all alone, displaying the movements the living orbs have shown, they move in groups of hundreds, thousands or millions, directed only by the wind. I am filming much larger individual living orbs, moving with intention, not micron particles blown by the wind.

It is also important to note in my films, an orb cannot be closer to the camera lens, than the object it moves behind, nor can it be further away than the object it moves in front of.

I have provided a selection of my many films illustrating my point, that living orbs are not out of focus tiny particles in the orb zone, on or close to the camera lens. They can be filmed far from the camera lens moving behind objects. View the following films and you decide: #orbs #orb

https://youtu.be/st_XrVuYNps
(Orb Moves Behind Tree)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb5OEjjlVik&feature=youtu.be
(Single Orb Moves Behind Tree Leaves)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPGx9LaBi34&feature=youtu.be
(The Irrelevance of The Orb Zone Theory)

https://youtu.be/zpFUnrIVilc
(Orb Moving Behind Tree Top)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyImu4REgd8&feature=youtu.be
(Orbs Moving Behind Objects)